From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> |
Cc: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture |
Date: | 1999-06-14 01:03:31 |
Message-ID: | 199906140103.KAA28678@srapc451.sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
>>I reverted back the patch for include/storage/s_lock.h and seems
>>NetBSD/m68k port begins to work again.
>>
>>I think we should revert back the linux/m68k patches and leave them
>>for 6.5.1. Objection?
>
>I would like to support linux/m68k, but on the Mac 68K platform the NetBSD
>folks are more numerous. Unless linux outnumbers NetBSD on some 68k
>platforms other than Mac (and I think Amiga) I don't think you should break
>a (mostly) working port in order to support a less widely used one.
I think the change I made in s_lock.h should make both NetBSD/m68k and
Linux/m68k happy. Can some Linux/m68k folks confirm it?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-06-14 01:08:41 | Beta5 == Tomorrow's Release .. |
Previous Message | Henry B. Hotz | 1999-06-14 00:50:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yoshihiko Aochi | 1999-06-14 05:36:54 | Porting PostgreSQL to Mac OS X Server |
Previous Message | Henry B. Hotz | 1999-06-14 00:50:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture |