Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>
Cc: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture
Date: 1999-06-14 01:03:31
Message-ID: 199906140103.KAA28678@srapc451.sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

>>I reverted back the patch for include/storage/s_lock.h and seems
>>NetBSD/m68k port begins to work again.
>>
>>I think we should revert back the linux/m68k patches and leave them
>>for 6.5.1. Objection?
>
>I would like to support linux/m68k, but on the Mac 68K platform the NetBSD
>folks are more numerous. Unless linux outnumbers NetBSD on some 68k
>platforms other than Mac (and I think Amiga) I don't think you should break
>a (mostly) working port in order to support a less widely used one.

I think the change I made in s_lock.h should make both NetBSD/m68k and
Linux/m68k happy. Can some Linux/m68k folks confirm it?
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-06-14 01:08:41 Beta5 == Tomorrow's Release ..
Previous Message Henry B. Hotz 1999-06-14 00:50:50 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yoshihiko Aochi 1999-06-14 05:36:54 Porting PostgreSQL to Mac OS X Server
Previous Message Henry B. Hotz 1999-06-14 00:50:50 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture