Re: [HACKERS] DEFAULT fixed

> Now that we know the problem comes from missing atttypmod info, it
> seems likely that related failures can occur for NUMERIC and other
> types that depend on atttypmod. (Are there any such types? Even
> if there aren't now, there will probably be more and more in future.)
> It might be best to just bite the bullet and make the parser carry
> around both the type's OID and typmod at all times.

I will try to add it, but I must not that there are some cases where I
don't have access to the atttypmod of the result, so it may not be
possible to do it in every case. Perhaps I should just leave this for
post 6.5, because we don't have any other bug reports on it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026