| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Masto <chris(at)netmonger(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list |
| Date: | 1999-05-12 02:15:13 |
| Message-ID: | 199905120215.WAA03847@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> o even if it's solved, still other many issues for huge databases
> still remain:
> - 4G-tuples-per-database problem (as you said)
This will be hard.
> - index files cannot extend >2GB
> - vacuuming a huge table will take unacceptable long time (I
> have heard vacuum speeds up for 6.5, but I have not tried it
> yet for a big table. so this is just a my guess)
>
> o it will take long time to solve all of them.
Vacuum is already faster. Vacuum across segments, multi-segment
indexes may be possible for 6.5.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-12 02:32:05 | Current Open Items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-12 02:11:22 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list |