| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Masto <chris(at)netmonger(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list |
| Date: | 1999-05-11 19:42:26 |
| Message-ID: | 199905111942.PAA21847@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> (BTW, has anyone been thinking about increasing OID to more than 4
> bytes? Folks are going to start hitting the 4G-tuples-per-database
> mark pretty soon.)
I have started to think about making our oid type more reliable as an
unsigned int. Internally, it is unsigned int, but there are some issues
where this is not portably hadled. It would double the current oid
maximum.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | gjerde | 1999-05-11 20:11:40 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-05-11 19:14:49 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list |