Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem?
Date: 1999-05-10 17:24:02
Message-ID: 199905101724.NAA09025@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Added to TODO list.

>
> Am I right in saying that the -o and -D arguments to pg_dump cannot work
> together? Any chance of this getting fixed?
>
> Otherwise is there any other way of deleting a column from a table
> whilst retaining oids? In general there seems there are problems with
> various scheme changes that you may want to do if you need to retain
> oids. Various SELECT INTO options don't work any more unless there is
> some way to set the oid in conjunction with named fields (like the -D
> option).
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-05-10 17:24:34 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-05-10 17:18:03 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE leaks file descriptors