Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: riedel+(at)CMU(dot)EDU (Erik Riedel)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins
Date: 1999-03-24 04:33:49
Message-ID: 199903240433.XAA26481@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> since I am __alpha (but __osf__, not linux), I get the version with
> the sizeof(int) instead of the sizeof(long).
>
> Can someone explain the comment from djm to me (or is djm still
> listening somewhere?). At first blush, I suspect that I actually
> _want_ it to do the latter version of LONGALIGN(), since my longs
> really are 8 bytes. But when I try to do that instead, I am unable to
> even run "initdb" - dies with an error like "attribute not
> found/invalid" (sorry, scrolled away the window with the actual error
> - I can re-create if the exact message would help anyone).
>
> Anyone have suggestions on how I might proceed? Are there known
> problems (or known-workings) of HashJoin on 64-bit platforms?
>

Good analysis. I never have understood the alpha issues. I realize
that initdb does not work in those cases, but never understood why.

Not sure who djm is.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-03-24 05:08:55 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL))
Previous Message Erik Riedel 1999-03-24 04:21:22 64-bit hashjoins