Re: [HACKERS] to text or not to text

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com (Vince Vielhaber)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] to text or not to text
Date: 1999-03-22 23:54:22
Message-ID: 199903222354.SAA24257@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> The docs say that the text type is the "Best choice" of the character data
> types. It was always my understanding that the text type was stored else-
> where in the database and a pointer to it was stored in the actual table.
> Does PostgreSQL do this or is a more efficient way been found? It seems
> that it'd be too expensive to store it elsewhere. I'm making some changes
> to a table and wanted to optomize it (varchar vs text).

Internally, text is stored just like char(). Only large objects are
stored outside the database.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-03-23 01:12:43 Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question
Previous Message Taral 1999-03-22 23:53:59 Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question