Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael(dot)Meskes(at)usa(dot)net (Michael Meskes)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again
Date: 1999-01-23 21:31:59
Message-ID: 199901232131.QAA05100@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> But isn't the pure existance of for update enough to have an error in the
> else branch?
>
> And can't we get the same error in the if branch as well with a having
> clause or something like that?

But we have those tests at the end, after the if/else, don't we?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-23 21:35:58 Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-01-23 21:28:40 UNION regress test is failing