Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev)
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion
Date: 1998-12-13 04:28:22
Message-ID: 199812130428.XAA14066@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> It's time to re-implement sequences! When they were implemented
> ~ 1.5 year ago there was no GRANT/REVOKE on VIEWs and so
> I had to create table for each sequence.
> There should be one system table - pg_sequence. One record
> for each sequence will be inserted into this table and
> one VIEW will be created:

I thought you wanted a single table to prevent concurrent access/update
contension?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-12-13 04:29:41 Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-12-13 04:27:11 Re: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE