| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su (Vadim B(dot) Mikheev) |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] =ANY bug |
| Date: | 1998-12-13 04:21:43 |
| Message-ID: | 199812130421.XAA13936@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Hi all,
>
> Because IN is semantically identical to =ANY
> here the same error using ANY:
>
> select * from emp where ename =ANY (
> select ename from emp group by ename having 1 < count(ename)
> );
Can I just say that using HAVING inside a subquery is buggy? Vadim, was
this already fixed?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-12-13 04:25:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Sorry to nag, but... [Failures with arrays] |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-12-13 04:20:28 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE |