Re: [GENERAL] alter table ?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il (Herouth Maoz)
Cc: kheflin(at)shreve(dot)net, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] alter table ?
Date: 1998-12-12 22:49:19
Message-ID: 199812122249.RAA06578@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> At 12:18 +0200 on 13/11/98, Kevin Heflin wrote:
>
>
> > Yea, I did that, but I guess what I'm looking for, was that when ever
> > anything was added to the table. Regardless of whether or not the
> > spamblock was specified, it would be set to 'TRUE'
>
> I guess adding constraints in alter statement is something to be placed in
> Postgres's todo list if it is not there already.

Added to TODO.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 1998-12-12 23:14:58 Re: [GENERAL] PL/pgSQL
Previous Message Bill Sneed 1998-12-12 22:09:19 Money