Re: [GENERAL] equivalent of sqlload?

From: "Michael A(dot) Koerber" <mak(at)ll(dot)mit(dot)edu>
To: Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)remapcorp(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] equivalent of sqlload?
Date: 1998-11-25 20:46:35
Message-ID: 199811252042.PAA22917@ll.mit.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Were am I looking for "limit" or "ulimit"?

mike

On Wed, 25 Nov 1998, Jeff Hoffmann wrote:

> you probably ran out of memory for the server process. check out "limit"
> (or "ulimit") -- you should be able to bump up the datasize to 64m or so
> (that's what mine is normally set to; i don't think i had to adjust it for
> the 5 million record+ table)
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Hoffmann 1998-11-25 21:18:28 Re: [GENERAL] equivalent of sqlload?
Previous Message Jeff Hoffmann 1998-11-25 20:01:02 Re: [GENERAL] equivalent of sqlload?