Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: robinson(at)public(dot)bta(dot)net(dot)cn, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Date: 1998-11-14 15:43:10
Message-ID: 199811141543.KAA28769@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Sat, 14 Nov 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > >Current FE/BE protocol seems pretty optimized to me, but you should know
> > > >the best. Seems like a waste to try and get it to match some standard,
> > >
> > > Well, I suppose you could make the same argument about SQL-92 compliance.
> > >
> > > Standards compliance is useful because it plugs you into the positive-
> > > feedback cycle of product development. Your product works with more
> > > products, more people use your product, more products are developed which
> > > work with your product, etc.
> >
> > Not really the same. There are end-user visible changes, and
> > developer-visible changes.
>
> From how things sound, I think that implementing Corba will be the
> trigger for 7.0...:)

Yep.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-11-14 16:19:19 Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-11-14 15:38:08 Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA