From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com |
Cc: | jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] psql's help |
Date: | 1998-10-22 13:51:19 |
Message-ID: | 199810221351.JAA19663@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > SET DateStyle TO
> > > 'ISO'|'SQL'|'Postgres'|'European'|'US'|'NonEuropean'
> > > set GEQO TO 'ON[=#]'|'OFF'
> > > set R_PLANS TO 'ON'| 'OFF'
> > > set QUERY_LIMIT TO #
> >
> > This is because KQSO is a workaround, that may even be gone by 6.4
> > final.
>
> I hope the QUERY_LIMIT too.
I still have that cnfify() possible fix to review for KQSO. Are you
still thinking limit for 6.4 final, or a minor release after that?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-10-22 13:52:14 | Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-10-22 13:45:56 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS Branch Tagging... |