Re: [HACKERS] psql's help

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql's help
Date: 1998-10-22 13:51:19
Message-ID: 199810221351.JAA19663@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > SET DateStyle TO
> > > 'ISO'|'SQL'|'Postgres'|'European'|'US'|'NonEuropean'
> > > set GEQO TO 'ON[=#]'|'OFF'
> > > set R_PLANS TO 'ON'| 'OFF'
> > > set QUERY_LIMIT TO #
> >
> > This is because KQSO is a workaround, that may even be gone by 6.4
> > final.
>
> I hope the QUERY_LIMIT too.

I still have that cnfify() possible fix to review for KQSO. Are you
still thinking limit for 6.4 final, or a minor release after that?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-22 13:52:14 Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-22 13:45:56 Re: [HACKERS] CVS Branch Tagging...