Re: [HACKERS] Problem on TODO list

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: meskes(at)usa(dot)net (Michael Meskes)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem on TODO list
Date: 1998-09-23 17:48:50
Message-ID: 199809231748.NAA02708@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I just scanned through the TODO list in the actual source tree. It seems
> this one isn't up-to-date since the ecpg entry is still old. Also I found
> this bug:

I have removed the actual version numbers of ecpg from the TODO list.

>
> * select upper(usename), count(usesysid) from pg_shadow group by 1 fails
>
> However, actual version says:
>
> mm=> select upper(usename), count(usesysid) from pg_shadow group by 1;
> upper |count
> --------+-----
> MESKES | 1
> POSTGRES| 1
> (2 rows)
>
> Seems to be okay, doesn't it?

Yep. Removed.

The current TODO list is always on our web site. The distribution gets
updated as part of the start of beta, and the final release.

--
Bruce Momjian | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
830 Blythe Avenue | http://www.op.net/~candle
Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 853-3000(h)
+ Christ can be your backup. |

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-09-23 17:52:44 Re: [HACKERS] datetime questions and fix to dt.c
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-09-23 16:46:00 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types?