Re: [HACKERS] index fix report

From: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, daybee(at)bellatlantic(dot)net (David Hartwig)
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] index fix report
Date: 1998-09-06 03:52:31
Message-ID: 199809060353.MAA18984@meshsv26.tk.mesh.ad.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 10:59 AM 98.9.4 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>This does help. Can you check UpdateRelationRelation(), which is called
>from create_index, and which calls CatalogIndexInsert()? Seems like the
>problem must be in that area.

The test case David showed no error on my LinuxPPC box.
maybe platform dependent.

>Looks like Tatsuo Ishii is on this already, as he has suggested some
>good fixes to heap_addheader(), which is called from
>UpdateRelationRelation().

No progress so far. I'm looking for the smallest test case which definitely
causes problems. But the behavior of the problems seem "random" on LinuxBox.
Really strange...

BTW, in catalog/pg_type.h:

#define Anum_pg_index_indisunique 8

I think this should be 9.

--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-09-06 04:50:48 Re: [HACKERS] index fix report
Previous Message Gerald Fischer 1998-09-05 23:47:39