From: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp (Tatsuo Ishii) |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, daybee(at)bellatlantic(dot)net (David Hartwig) |
Cc: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] index fix report |
Date: | 1998-09-06 03:52:31 |
Message-ID: | 199809060353.MAA18984@meshsv26.tk.mesh.ad.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:59 AM 98.9.4 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>This does help. Can you check UpdateRelationRelation(), which is called
>from create_index, and which calls CatalogIndexInsert()? Seems like the
>problem must be in that area.
The test case David showed no error on my LinuxPPC box.
maybe platform dependent.
>Looks like Tatsuo Ishii is on this already, as he has suggested some
>good fixes to heap_addheader(), which is called from
>UpdateRelationRelation().
No progress so far. I'm looking for the smallest test case which definitely
causes problems. But the behavior of the problems seem "random" on LinuxBox.
Really strange...
BTW, in catalog/pg_type.h:
#define Anum_pg_index_indisunique 8
I think this should be 9.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-09-06 04:50:48 | Re: [HACKERS] index fix report |
Previous Message | Gerald Fischer | 1998-09-05 23:47:39 |