Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch)
Date: 1998-08-19 17:56:00
Message-ID: 199808191756.NAA04184@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> If nobody votes against, I would like to make them builtins
> as pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() and then setup the
> appropriate views (pg_rule and pg_view) in template1 by
> initdb like we do it with pg_user. It cannot break anything,
> except that a rule action the two functions cannot handle
> will make the new views unusable. But it would be a really
> powerful possibility for pg_dump or just useful to see what
> that damn event qual and parsetree's in pg_rewrite came from.
>
> Comments?
>

Go, Jan, go.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dr. Michael Meskes 1998-08-19 18:09:35 Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1998-08-19 17:13:27 Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch)