From: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
---|---|
To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Broken source tree |
Date: | 1998-08-06 04:42:56 |
Message-ID: | 199808060442.NAA01117@srapc451.sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>I did a CVSup a few minutes ago, and tried to do a clean install.
>configure seemed to do the right thing, but initdb was not
>happy. Looks
Seems linux users have been experiencing problems with initdb, and I
decided to make another challenge of installing PostgreSQL to my
RedHat 4.0 box from scratch. (I did cvs up a few hours ago). So far no
problem was found.
>like (perhaps) the recent changes to initdb to allow non-interactive use
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>might have broken things?
I didn't know about this. Maybe you mean the patches I have sent
recently?
>Regarding specific symptoms:
>1) libpq.so.1 did get made and is in the right place afaik. Don't know
>why pg_id is complaining.
don't know too.
>2) initdb has a syntax error in the script.
maybe due to pg_id returning null string?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | t-ishii | 1998-08-06 04:45:28 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-06 04:35:36 | Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status |