Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now...

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Backends fetch 1024 XIDs now and place them in shmem.
> > > There is space in VariableCache struct for OIDs as well
> > > but I didn't change GetNewObjectId() due to the
> > > CheckMaxObjectId() stuff... Bruce ?
> >
> > What can I do to help? Is the problem that a backend can set the next
> > oid by specifiying an oid greater than the current one?
>
> No problem - I just havn't time to think about this, sorry.
>
> >
> > >
> > > All other LLL stuff will be #ifdef-ed...
> >
> > As far as I am concerned, you don't need use #ifdef.
>
> I'm not sure how much ready/robust this will be in 6.4.
> This is long-term project...

Any chance on getting the 30-second pg_log syncing, so we can improve
the default pgsql performance, and not do fsync on every transaction by
default?

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)