From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Anyone working on optimizing subset min/max queries? |
Date: | 1998-07-13 21:31:34 |
Message-ID: | 199807132131.RAA28670@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> For now, I can live with scanning all the table entries, but it would be
> nice to know that someone is working on this and it'll be there by the
> time my tables get huge ;-). I see something about
> * Use indexes in ORDER BY, min(), max()(Costin Oproiu)
> in the TODO list, but is this actively being worked on, and will it
> solve my problem or just handle simpler cases?
>
> Alternatively, is there a better way to do predecessor/successor
> queries in SQL?
Costin is not working on it currently, and I have removed his name from
the item. I know of no one working on it, though it is requested every
so often.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-07-13 21:50:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1998-07-13 20:53:47 | Anyone working on optimizing subset min/max queries? |