Re: [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it (Jose' Soares Da Silva)
Cc: ccb(at)pubweb(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error
Date: 1998-06-20 02:49:42
Message-ID: 199806200249.WAA05519@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Charles Bennett wrote:
>
> >
> > I (thought I) forwarded fixes for the pg_dump constraint syntax
> > bug to this list a couple of weeks ago. I added a -c (compatible)
> > switch to pg_dump to force it to dump constraints in a syntax that
> > pgsql can understand.
> >
> > Here's another copy of the diffs (against 6.3.2).
> >
> > ccb
> I applied your patch, Charles and it works, obviouly I remove the -c parameter
> because there isn't another syntax for CONSTRAINTs. PostgreSQL has
> the SQL92 syntax.

OK, I have removed the -c syntax for pg_dump, so all dumps now use the
new format.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-06-20 02:58:43 Re: bug with prune_joinrel() in 6.3.2
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-06-19 14:47:47 Re: [HACKERS] Need help understanding unique indices (fwd)