Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver

From: Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih+mail(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver
Date: 1998-04-18 01:10:30
Message-ID: 199804180110.KAA11003@mustang.sdc.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>
> > I do not know what the internal representation is but they are
> > displayed by psql as either dd-mm-yyyy or mm-dd-yyyy depending on
> > whether the server has -o -e or not. As in most parts of the world,
> > Australia uses dd-mm-yyyy as a standard.
>
> Well, no. I have no idea which is more common of the two you mention,
> but the majority of the people of this world actually use the ISO 8601
> standard representation: yyyy-mm-dd.
>
OK. Point taken.

However, the point that I was trying to make is that, to my knowledge, nobody
outside the US uses mm/dd.

Cheers,
Stephen.

========================================================================
Stephen Davies Consulting scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au
Adelaide, South Australia. Voice: 61-8-82728863
Computing & Network solutions. Fax: 61-8-82741015

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Luk 1998-04-18 01:46:40 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 1998-04-17 22:35:58 Re: [INTERFACES] Naming of the PostreSQL ODBC .dll file