Re: [HACKERS] patch for memory overrun on Linux(i386)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mgittens(at)gits(dot)nl (Maurice Gittens)
Cc: dg(at)illustra(dot)com, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, mgittens(at)david(dot)gits(dot)nl, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patch for memory overrun on Linux(i386)
Date: 1998-03-22 20:00:56
Message-ID: 199803222000.PAA17475@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >That said, I have a plan in mind to get a nice performance boost for
> palloc().
> >As a side effect, I will guarantee 8 byte alignment of pointers returned
> >from palloc().
> >
> Does this imply that more memory will be used that strictly necesary under
> linux?
>
> With regards from Maurice.

Actually, perhaps less memory, because malloc memory is not aligned on
double boundaries, but this is all still just conjecture.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-22 20:01:43 Re: [HACKERS] patch for memory overrun on Linux(i386)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-03-22 18:26:06 Re: [HACKERS] urgent: pgsql 6.3 FreeBSD port update trouble, --with-tcl doesn't work