Re: [HACKERS] Unique index using hash?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ocie(at)paracel(dot)com
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unique index using hash?
Date: 1998-03-17 03:02:49
Message-ID: 199803170302.WAA01018@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I was playing around with my latest compile and tried to make a unique
> index on two columns, using a hash method. Both of these (more than
> one column and unique) are currently not allowed for hash indexes.
>
> I thought about this for a bit and realized that making a NESTED hash
> index (index on a and b also serves as an index on a) would be a
> trick, but allowing the unique clause should not be a problem.
>
> Therefore, I would like to try implementing unique constraints on hash
> indexes. Has this come up before? Are there any reasons not to
> support this? As far as I understand, specifying an index method is
> non standard (above and beyond standard) to begin with.
>

It is on the TODO list:

* add UNIQUE capability to non-btree indexes

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-17 03:20:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-03-17 02:52:04 Re: [QUESTIONS] UPDATE statement ORACLE 6 compatible