| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (maillist) |
| Cc: | dg(at)illustra(dot)com, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, chris(at)topdog(dot)pas1(dot)logicon(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables? |
| Date: | 1998-03-13 14:49:01 |
| Message-ID: | 199803131449.JAA12924@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Yes, the threading topic has come up before, and I have never considered
> it a big win. We want to remove the exec() from the startup, so we just
> do a fork. Will save 0.001 seconds of startup.
>
> That is a very easy win for us. I hadn't considered the synchonization
> problems with palloc/pfree, and that could be a real problem.
I was wrong here. Removing exec() will save 0.01 seconds, not 0.001
seconds. Typical backend startup and a single query is 0.08 seconds.
Removal of exec() will take this down to 0.07 seconds.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-03-13 15:04:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Keyword |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 1998-03-13 14:46:08 | Re: PL/PgSQL discussion |