Re: AW: [HACKERS] attlen weirdness?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at (Zeugswetter Andreas)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] attlen weirdness?
Date: 1998-03-11 19:08:04
Message-ID: 199803111908.OAA21852@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Quoting Bruce Momjian (maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us):
> > I assume you are asking of attlen for char() and varchar() have the max
> > length. The answer is now NO. They are varlena structures like text,
> > and so have a attlen of -1. Atttypmod for that pg_attribute row now has
> > the defined length.
> >
>
> Even for a char(4) field? ok, if attlen doesn't give the
> length of a field, how do I find it?
>
> Right now: yes, but I would like to see the char() type changed to a fixed length type (which it really is)
> then it would have the length in attlen. Right now the length for char and varchar is in atttypmod.
>

Again, we can do this, but we then have to have atttypmod available in
all places where we check for length. I will add it to the TODO list.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett McCormick 1998-03-11 20:29:14 Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-11 19:05:17 Re: [HACKERS] indexing words slow