From: | Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk (Oliver Elphick), pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions |
Date: | 1998-02-23 23:06:32 |
Message-ID: | 199802232306.PAA24445@abraxas.scene.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
So I've never gotten the distinction -- what makes postgreSQL an
object oriented database, aside from the oid attribute and class
inheritance (which could work a little better.. no way to find out the
child class of a tuple in a select from parent_class* query).
and what makes it relational? the fact that it can do joins?
in confused delerium,
--brett
On Mon, 23 February 1998, at 17:35:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Will be the default in 6.3, I think.
>
> > the table or even discover that it exists!
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Not in 6.3, or maybe ever. Too much OO stuff for that, I think.
>
> >
> > It certainly seems undesirable to give automatic access to data of unknown
> > sensitivity. Surely the default permission should be for the table's
> > creator alone or for the owner of the PostgreSQL database (which I suppose
> > is equivalent to the `schema').
> >
> > I see that Jan Wieck has posted a method for preventing world readability;
> > perhaps this should just be flagged as a configurable option.
>
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
> + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | t-ishii | 1998-02-24 00:57:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Current 6.3 issues |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-02-23 22:35:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions |