Re: [HACKERS] Bug?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tih(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO (Tom I Helbekkmo)
Cc: meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug?
Date: 1998-02-06 18:00:12
Message-ID: 199802061800.NAA15035@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Bruce Momjian said:
>
> > The only fix for this would be to read all integers in as 64-bit
> > integers, then do the conversion, but that could be a performance
> > problem.
>
> Michael Meskes answered:
>
> > I agree. And performance is important. I think explicit type
> > conversion is what we should do. Or is it asked for too much if the
> > user has to add a ::float8 to the number?
>
> Am I being dense here? Can there really be a significant performance
> hit in the parsing of a query? Let's say that it takes a millisecond
> extra to do the right thing with a number. Does it matter? How many
> queries per second can we expect to process anyway?

I don't know of standard ways to read in 64-bit integers.

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-06 18:01:31 Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-06 17:46:05 Re: [HACKERS] Profile of current backend