Re: [HACKERS] CBAC (content based access control), OIDs, auto fields

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: de(at)ucolick(dot)org (De Clarke)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CBAC (content based access control), OIDs, auto fields
Date: 1998-01-15 21:03:19
Message-ID: 199801152103.QAA16301@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Am I alone in thinking this would be incredibly cool and
> worth some effort? I would love to see PG be demonstrably
> BETTER than the commercial competition in several specific
> areas (then maybe I could get approval to use it for
> production work) and this looks like a good opportunity.
>

Yes, these would all be nice, but we have to get the 'bread and butter'
features working perfectly first, like subselects.

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-15 21:05:54 Re: [HACKERS] Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff
Previous Message De Clarke 1998-01-15 20:53:00 CBAC (content based access control), OIDs, auto fields