Re: FreeBSD and large shared_buffers a no-go?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kirk Strauser <kirk(at)strauser(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and large shared_buffers a no-go?
Date: 2009-01-07 18:30:43
Message-ID: 19933.1231353043@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Kirk Strauser <kirk(at)strauser(dot)com> writes:
> First, shmget is asking for a lot less than shmmax - why is it failing?

Check to see if things work as expected when you have shmmax and shmall
set to a shade less than 2GB and fail when they are a shade more. If
so, it would seem there's a signed-integer-overflow bug somewhere in the
kernel's handling of shmem requests ... which would be a reportable
kernel bug.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gerhard Heift 2009-01-07 18:31:13 stable function called for every row?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-07 17:58:05 Re: The length of a tsvector (lexemes + positions) must be less than 1 megabyte