Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jonathan <jonathan(at)leto(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly
Date: 2010-02-22 21:31:05
Message-ID: 1989.1266874265@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> How about something like the below?

I still think that this is optimizing the wrong thing. We care about
the clarity of the message the user sees, not about how short or clean
the Perl code is. I'm inclined to stay with the same basic
implementation and just hack up the regexp some more to cope with 5.11's
more verbose -v output.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-02-22 21:31:40 Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly
Previous Message Jonathan Leto 2010-02-22 21:30:56 Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly