Re: large objects and pg 7.3.x

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: andremachado(at)techforce(dot)com(dot)br, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: large objects and pg 7.3.x
Date: 2003-08-19 04:08:18
Message-ID: 19835.1061266098@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The easy way to define "lo" now is just as a domain over oid:
>> CREATE DOMAIN lo AS oid;

> I'm suspicious if it still works even in 7.4.
> Can we find the oid of the domain "lo" in the row description
> message from the backend ?

Hm, I think the column type will be reported as "oid", because the
JDBC crowd argued that they didn't want to know about domains.
Is that a problem for ODBC?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-08-19 04:44:49 Re: large objects and pg 7.3.x
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-08-19 04:02:57 Re: large objects and pg 7.3.x