| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/commands/variable.c b ... |
| Date: | 2003-05-22 16:05:29 |
| Message-ID: | 19671.1053619529@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I thought this might be new because of my upgrade to BSD/OS 4.3, but I
> just checked my 4.2 machine and it also doesn't have tzname. Seems this
> might be the first time we are referencing tzname if struct tm already
> exists. Can we switch to a struct tm/tzname solution?
Don't see how --- tzset doesn't return a struct tm. We may have to just
not make the test on machines without tzname[]. Grotty, but they're no
worse off than before...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-22 16:39:31 | pgsql-server/ onfig/c-library.m4 /configure /c ... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-22 15:49:31 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/commands/variable.c b ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-05-22 17:03:09 | Re: Is postgres 7.2.1 safe if there is a power fail. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-22 15:49:31 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/commands/variable.c b ... |