| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting |
| Date: | 2011-01-28 15:35:48 |
| Message-ID: | 19524.1296228948@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>>> Agreed. I submitted the patch before, but I forgot to update it
>>>> and add it to CF.
>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTimuHbxbuM+zLkaEX3aDqSeiMUE3xb4ww1QtsLmf@mail.gmail.com
>>
>> Great!
> I hate to be a wet blanket, but the number of patches in this CF is
> going the wrong direction.
Yes. I'm not sure that the fact that something was discussed months ago
entitles the submitter to a free exemption from the requirement to meet
the CF submission deadline.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | JonY | 2011-01-28 15:37:19 | Re: mingw64 |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-01-28 15:23:01 | Re: mingw64 |