Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, rereading the config file would kill my idea --- but what API are
> we going to pass SET to applications?
Passing the info up the client-side stack is an issue, yes, but it will
be so in any case. If it's not there in the protocol we haven't even
got a foothold to solve the problem ...
> Sure, but how are we going to treat SET in the client?
Not following your concern here. SET is what it always was.
regards, tom lane