Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues
Date: 2002-09-16 03:48:48
Message-ID: 19443.1032148128@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Everything in this proposal looks pretty good. With regards to the above
> abstime<->int4 thing - what about the 'magic' values in that conversion.
> (eg. -infinity, etc.)

They map to some magic int4 values, same as it ever was. I'm not
interested in trying to improve the semantics of any specific conversion
at the moment...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-09-16 03:56:02 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-16 03:46:05 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?