Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT
Date: 2006-04-25 15:17:14
Message-ID: 19391.1145978234@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> No other object type has the ability to require you to stop the server
> and start a standalone backend to fix the mistake, which is what makes
> this thing unique.

This one doesn't either. I already pointed out two reasons why not:
1. you can connect to a different database (eg template1 or postgres)
and fix the problem from there.
2. the restriction won't be enforced against superusers anyway.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-25 15:19:54 Re: [HACKERS] Suggestion: Which Binary?
Previous Message Gevik Babakhani 2006-04-25 15:12:18 Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT