Re: updated WIP: arrays of composites

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: updated WIP: arrays of composites
Date: 2007-05-10 19:29:38
Message-ID: 19382.1178825378@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The attached version removes all the places we had NAMEDATALEN - 2
> restrictions on object names. If there's no objection I will commit this
> shortly, as I think it now does all the previously agreed things.

It needs some work yet, but I'll go over it and commit it.

BTW, just idly looking at this, I'm wondering whether we couldn't
now support arrays of domains too. If record_in/record_out work for
array elements, why wouldn't domain_in/domain_out?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-05-10 20:16:49 Re: updated WIP: arrays of composites
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-05-10 17:04:09 Re: updated WIP: arrays of composites