Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes

From: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes
Date: 2011-06-17 01:15:41
Message-ID: 1927607009.268722.1308273341744.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Bruce,

> I should back up and explain that the reason for having usernames on
> release feature items is not to give credit, but rather to assign
> blame
> later, in case the features cause problems. The submitter becomes the
> default go-to person for problems with that item. Having a list of
> reviewers does not serve that purpose, hence the slippery slope
> comment.

Well, unfortunately, while you and I might understand that, most of our community does not. And to the completely uninitiated, it sure looks like credit.

All of this is becoming less of a problem as we update the contributor list regularly. If I can clean up the sponsors list as well, I think we'll hear less complaints.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-17 03:48:27 Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-16 22:24:16 Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes