Re: Postgres Instability

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: karl(at)debisschop(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Instability
Date: 2000-05-25 02:58:26
Message-ID: 19234.959223506@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)h00a0cc3b7988(dot)ne(dot)mediaone(dot)net> writes:
> But I did want to put my counter-example out there so that Linux users
> wouldn't get the sense that your fine product is somehow unreliable on
> Linux. IIRC, Linux is a large part of your installed base - no real
> point in scaring them off. Even if there are other legitimate arguments
> for other OS's.

Marc is a bit of a FreeBSD partisan ;-). Don't worry about it.

I agree with your theory that there's some fundamental configuration
or installation error here --- but I don't see what it is, yet.

I suspect that "planx plnetx"'s native language is not English, and
so he might be missing some critical bit of information from the
documentation. If he'd tell us which language(s) he's more
comfortable in, perhaps there are speakers here who could help him.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Denis Perchine 2000-05-25 03:03:27 Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 7.0 a success
Previous Message Bryan White 2000-05-25 02:57:14 Re: PG 7.0 is 2.5 times slower running a big report