Re: User names

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Glen and Rosanne Eustace" <agree(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User names
Date: 2000-12-14 05:41:34
Message-ID: 19219.976772494@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Glen and Rosanne Eustace" <agree(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> Is there a defined max length for postgreSQL user names ?
> If there is and it is 8, then createuser should enforce it.
> If the length is > 8 then pg_passwd needs fixing so that it doesn't
> truncate.

A quick look in the pg_passwd sources indeed shows some hardwired limits
on both username and password length. This is bogus. Anyone want to
contribute a patch?

For the record, the max username length should be NAMEDATALEN-1, and
the password field in pg_shadow is 'text', so it should be happy to
take any password that you're willing to type ;-). However, crypt
password processing depends on crypt(3), which more than likely ignores
characters beyond the eighth on most platforms.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • User names at 2000-12-13 17:34:33 from Glen and Rosanne Eustace

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Mercer 2000-12-14 06:06:53 Re: User names
Previous Message Sandeep Joshi 2000-12-14 05:04:02 trigger

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-14 05:44:43 Re: (Updated) Table File Format
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-12-14 05:02:26 Re: pg_options.sample