| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bumping block size to 16K on FreeBSD... |
| Date: | 2003-08-28 20:49:14 |
| Message-ID: | 19212.1062103754@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
>> You do realize that you'll be forcing initdbs on people if you
>> blithely add and remove such a patch?
> Yup. I was tempted to include another patch just to bump the catalog
> version in the event that it doesn't gracefully detect differing block
> sizes... haven't tested if it does that or not.
It does, and you will definitely incur my wrath if you start putting in
unnecessary platform-specific catversion hacks.
>> I think we forced an initdb for beta2 for other reasons, but I'm
>> hoping to avoid any more in the 7.4 branch.
> 1) People shouldn't be using -devel for production
No, but they might reasonably hope to segue a beta installation into
production without yet-another reload ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-08-28 20:51:09 | Re: New array functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-28 20:45:59 | Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with |