| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH |
| Date: | 2011-10-14 19:59:44 |
| Message-ID: | 19147.1318622384@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Oops, I see a problem. Right now, our first major release has no zero,
> e.g. 9.2, while our minors have a third digit, 9.2.5. The problem is
> that with this patch it is confusing to have a psql config file that
> matches 9.2.0, but not 9.2.5, because you can't write 9.2.0.
Uh, this seems like nonsense. We've been labeling major releases with
a dot-zero for some time, and that's embedded in process now (cf
version_stamp.pl) to the point that we're unlikely to forget to do so.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-14 20:32:54 | Underspecified window queries in regression tests |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-10-14 19:53:53 | Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH |