From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Date: | 2004-05-20 01:13:02 |
Message-ID: | 1911.24.211.141.25.1085015582.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier said:
> On Wed, 19 May 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> People,
>>
>> > >So, why tie it into the PostgreSQL source tree? Won't it be
>> > >popular enough to live on its own, that it has to be distributed as
>> > >part of the core?
>>
>> Personally, I find it rather inconsistent to have any PL, other than
>> PL/pgSQL, as part of the core distribution -- when we are pushing the
>> interfaces, such as JDBC and libpqxx to seperate modules in pgFoundry.
>
> Actually, JDBC, libpqxx, ODBC, plPHP, plPerlNG are all really easy to
> push over to pgFoundry ... they have very active, and visible,
> developers responsible for them ... is anyone out there directing work
> on pl/pgsql or pl/TCL? If so, they are easy to move also ...
>
>> Either we're trying to lighten up the core, or we're not. But right
>> now there seems to be no logic in operation.
>
> Its easier to *not add* something to core (ie. plPHP/plPerlNG) then it
> is to remove something (see JDBC) ...
>
plperlng is not "something not in the core". It is a project to improve
something that *is* in the core. That has always been my intention, and it
is clear from his comments that it has always been Joshua Drake's too.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-20 01:19:32 | Re: Join works in 7.3.6, fails in 7.4.2 |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-05-20 00:51:09 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |