From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Query Plan Columns |
Date: | 2010-11-06 18:44:54 |
Message-ID: | 190D4156-3191-4209-9939-9F1D2C8D2B41@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Nov 5, 2010, at 1:42 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/commands/explain.c;h=f494ec98e510c23120e072bd5ee8821ea12738a4;hb=HEAD#l617
>
> Ah, great, thanks.
So based on this, I've come up with:
"Node Type" TEXT,
"Strategy" TEXT,
"Operation" TEXT,
"Startup Cost" FLOAT,
"Total Cost" FLOAT,
"Plan Rows" FLOAT,
"Plan Width" INTEGER,
"Actual Startup Time" FLOAT,
"Actual Total Time" FLOAT,
"Actual Rows" FLOAT,
"Actual Loops" FLOAT,
"Parent Relationship" TEXT,
"Sort Key" TEXT[],
"Sort Method" TEXT[],
"Sort Space Used" BIGINT,
"Sort Space Type" TEXT,
"Join Type" TEXT,
"Join Filter" TEXT,
"Hash Cond" TEXT,
"Relation Name" NAME,
"Alias" NAME,
"Scan Direction" TEXT,
"Index Name" TEXT,
"Index Cond" TEXT,
"Recheck Cond" TEXT,
"TID Cond" TEXT,
"Merge Cond" TEXT,
"Subplan Name" TEXT,
"Function Name" TEXT,
"Function Call" TEXT,
"Filter" TEXT,
"One-Time Filter" TEXT,
"Command" TEXT,
"Shared Hit Blocks" BIGINT,
"Shared Read Blocks" BIGINT,
"Shared Written Blocks" BIGINT,
"Local Hit Blocks" BIGINT,
"Local Read Blocks" BIGINT,
"Local Written Blocks" BIGINT,
"Temp Read Blocks" BIGINT,
"Temp Written Blocks" BIGINT,
"Output" TEXT[],
"Hash Buckets" BIGINT,
"Hash Batches" BIGINT,
"Original Hash Batches" BIGINT,
"Peak Memory Usage" BIGINT,
"Schema" TEXT,
"CTE Name" TEXT
Does that seem reasonable? Am I missing anything obvious?
Thanks,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-11-06 18:45:53 | Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm? |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2010-11-06 18:22:16 | Re: Simplifying replication |