Re: to_char and i18n

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Subject: Re: to_char and i18n
Date: 2005-12-22 04:50:14
Message-ID: 19091.1135227014@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I thought to_char already had i18n behavior. What exactly are you
>> thinking of changing?

> The modifiers that are suitable to localize. Month and day names comes
> to mind and maybe others, I'm not sure what the state of the code is,
> but I can say that, at least, the 'month' and 'day' modifiers does not
> behave in a localized way.

Can we spell the names differently but keep to the same field widths?
I can see where it might cause problems to change the widths --- other
than that, no objection.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manuel Sugawara 2005-12-22 04:58:47 Re: to_char and i18n
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-22 04:38:53 Re: to_char and i18n

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manuel Sugawara 2005-12-22 04:58:47 Re: to_char and i18n
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-22 04:38:53 Re: to_char and i18n