Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly
Date: 2008-11-06 14:33:00
Message-ID: 19062.1225981980@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> writes:
> However, I wonder if the oid field should be also preserved at same
> place, not inside a specific trigger function.

Possibly. I wasn't planning to mess with it now; but if you've fixed
the other problems with assigning to a system column then maybe we
should allow it for OIDs too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-11-06 14:39:27 Re: [WIP] In-place upgrade
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-11-06 14:30:07 Re: [WIP] In-place upgrade