Re: pg_dump with low priority?

From: Aaron Glenn <aaron(dot)glenn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump with low priority?
Date: 2005-10-24 19:30:50
Message-ID: 18f601940510241230q41582d38kbb31bf5b54f598c3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/24/05, CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> nice comes to mind:
>
> nice pg_dump ...
>

as mentioned earlier...nice isn't going to do anything for I/O. PITR
(point in time recovery) would be, in my opinion, the best solution to
this problem.

aaron.glenn

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message William Yu 2005-10-24 19:45:41 Re: FoxPro in WINE to Postgresql on LINUX?
Previous Message CSN 2005-10-24 19:18:06 Re: pg_dump with low priority?