Re: Shared row locking

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shared row locking
Date: 2004-12-20 14:58:06
Message-ID: 18969.1103554686@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> Gavin also mentioned to me we should also control the amount of memory
> the shared inval queue uses.

Perhaps, but I've really seen no evidence that there's a need to worry
about that. Without demonstrated problems I'd sooner keep that code a
bit simpler and faster.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-12-20 15:50:07 Re: Help extending pg_class
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-12-20 14:56:29 Re: Shared row locking