Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.1.3 with source NAMEDATALEN change fails name regression

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David De Graff" <postgresql(at)awarehouse(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.1.3 with source NAMEDATALEN change fails name regression
Date: 2001-11-27 15:06:04
Message-ID: 18840.1006873564@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
"David De Graff" <postgresql(at)awarehouse(dot)com> writes:
> I then remembered the needed source code edit, wiped the installation and s=
> tarted afresh. The build went cleanly this time but the name regression tes=
> t failed. This isn't completely out of left field given the change, but I n=
> eed to know
> a) if it is a significant failure and
> b) if it should fail. If not, is this a bug in the source or the test?

I'd expect that; the regression test tests truncation of names, and
naturally it's set up for 32-byte names.  You should be able to validate
the results by eyeball.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Henry B. HotzDate: 2001-11-30 19:57:56
Subject: Darwin/MacOSX 10.1.1 configure issues with b3
Previous:From: David De GraffDate: 2001-11-27 08:02:48
Subject: 7.1.3 with source NAMEDATALEN change fails name regression

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group